So, I just got off the phone with my sister, Megan, who some of you have met. She is Team Jacob all the way.
Anyway, she is re-reading Eclipse in preparation for Breaking Dawn to come out, and she was thinking to herself, "Why, WHY won't Jacob imprint on Bella?" because she can't see Bella wanting to be with Edward over Jacob (though she does love Edward, too. Just not like she loves her werewolf).
She came up with a theory: Jacob CAN'T imprint on Bella, because Bella has been bitten by a vampire - James bit her at the end of Twilight.
This just makes sense in my mind. I told her I'd post it (and give her credit for it) and see what you guys think. It makes her feel a lot better about Jacob and Bella not being together.
Thought I'd share!!!
Monday, July 28, 2008
New Theory!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 enjoyed the bouquet.:
that is a good theory. I have no idea if that is how it works or not. but I like it. now, how to work in a comment about skewering a fur kabob?
I should have been patient and posted this as a QOD. Oh well.
My sister would DEFINITELY skewer some fur kabobs with you. lol. She has crappy internet at home and can't get blogger at work (though now that I think about it, maybe she could get our site?), so I read her Rob's quote about fighting like a little bitch and Alison's open invitation letter to Rob regarding him, shirtless, doing a plumber act. ;-) She loved it.
You guys can come up with all the reasons you want... but Jacob doesn't imprint on Bella, cause she is simply not the one for him :)
I like this theory, it gives me hope and debunks all those crappy theories of Jacob imprinting on Tanya. Gross.
seriously. gross.
Man you all are so good at coming up with good Theories! I'm terrible at that! I think this one is VERY interesting! Good thinking!!
Post a Comment